• Home
  • About
    • Mission
    • History
    • Directors and Advisors
    • PNA Team
  • Publications
    • Newsroom
    • Blogs >
      • Harmony Todd
      • Krystin Garcia
      • Tricia Whiting
      • Tony Rinna
      • Jena Santoro
      • Karima Oglesby
      • Raub Dakwale
      • Jon Miller
      • Gabriella Nolan
      • Drew Martin
    • Exchanges
    • Insights
    • InfoGraphics!
    • Resources >
      • Nuclear Glossary
      • Nukes by the Numbers
  • Nuclear Budget Campaign
    • PA Nuclear Budget
    • NY Nuclear Budget
  • Get Involved
    • Events
    • Contact Policy Makers... >
      • Diplomacy Begets Disarmament!
      • Support Cuts to the Nuclear Weapons Budget
    • PNA Fellowships
    • Newsletter
    • Nuclear Bingo
  • Contact
  • Support

Iran's Threats

1/22/2013

0 Comments

 
Iran’s nuclear ambitions have been at the forefront of media coverage for a while now, particularly given the recent failed IAEA talks and the United States’ inherent mistrust of the regime. In a recent Op-Ed in the New York Times, columnist Bill Keller addressed the nuclear situation in Iran and analyzed the Iranian strategic position. He writes:

"Let’s assume, for starters, that Iran’s theocrats are determined to acquire nuclear weapons. Western analysts say there is no evidence yet that the supreme leader has made that decision. But if you ruled a country surrounded by unfriendly neighbors — Persians among the Arabs, Shiites among the Sunnis — a country with a grand sense of self-esteem, a tendency to paranoia and five nuclear powers nearby, wouldn’t you want the security of your own nuclear arsenal?"

Two factors stand out from Keller’s point. First, the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, does have sway over the situation; indeed, in 2005 he issued a fatwa that bans nuclear weapons under Islamic Law. Iranian authorities point to this religious decree as strong evidence that Iran is not moving towards developing nuclear weapons and cite a lack of cultural awareness between the West and the Islamic Republic as a main source of tension. Some Western analysts, however, do not trust the veracity of Iran’s claims and feel that the Supreme Leader is merely attempting to outwit the West.

Beyond the involvement of the Supreme Leader, is Keller correct when he attaches strategic importance to Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons? An interactive map on Al Jazeera, last updated in May of 2012, shows the extent to which Iran is surrounded by American bases: 

http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/interactive/2012/04/2012417131242767298.html

American forces line the coast of Saudi Arabi and the Emirates, and the U.S. also has significant troop presence in Afghanistan. Moreover, Iran shares a border to the southeast with Pakistan, a nuclear state, and is also geographically close to Israel, which, though unacknowledged, possess approximately 200 nuclear warheads and has consistently taken an aggressive stance towards Iran. Clearly, Keller’s argument that Iran may feel threatened is quite logical.

The point here is not to justify Iran’s desire for nuclear weapons, but to identify an important strategic explanation why Iran might pursue nuclear weapons. Iran, surrounded by U.S. forces and threatened from the west by a nuclear Israel, could be interested in developing nuclear weapons with its own security interests in mind.  


Jon Miller
Fellow
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    November 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012

    Categories

    All
    Asia
    Cost Of Nuclear Weapons
    Middle East
    Missile Defense
    Regulations
    Safety

    RSS Feed

    Donate
    Invest in a Safer Future
Powered by
✕